U.S. no longer “Safe Third Country” Canada court rules

author avatar
Shelby Thevenot
Published: July 22, 2020

The Federal Court of Canada has struck the U.S. off of the Safe Third Country Agreement, which could affect thousands of asylum-seekers if it comes into effect.

The Safe Third Country Agreement between Canada and the U.S. states that asylum-seekers must claim refugee protection in the first safe country they arrive in, with certain exceptions. Many people have been turned away under the provision since it came into effect in 2004, with notable increases since 2016 once the Trump administration began targeting undocumented migrants in the States.

Since then, refugees, lawyers and advocacy groups have been calling on Canada to end the agreement with the U.S., often saying it is no longer a safe country.

Federal Court Judge Ann Marie McDonald found the agreement to be unconstitutional. The July 22 ruling stated that the act of sending people back to the U.S., where they were at risk of imprisonment, violated their rights to life, liberty, and security. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms applies to anyone who physically enters Canada, including people who are coming to make a refugee claim.

The decision is currently in political limbo as Canada’s justice department has 30 days to decide whether they want to appeal the ruling. If the government does not appeal, the decision will come into effect in six months.

However, if they do appeal, the decision will be put on hold until the appeal is decided in court. If the feds win the appeal, the decision reached on July 22 can either be overturned or they can reach a new decision. If the appeal is denied then the decision stands and asylum-seekers crossing the Canada-U.S. border will not be turned away under the Safe Third Country Agreement.

Nedira Jemal Mustefa, one of the refugee applicants challenging the agreement, was arrested after being turned around at the Canadian border and placed in solitary confinement for a week. The ruling cited her affidavit, describing her experience as “terrifying, isolating, and psychologically traumatic.” She described losing 15 pounds as a result of not eating, saying that she was given pork even though she told officers she could not eat it for religious reasons. She and other refugees from the ruling also described the facility as “abnormally cold.” Mustefa was in U.S. prison for a month before being released on bond.

“Canada cannot turn a blind eye to the consequences that befell Ms. Mustefa in its efforts to adhere to the [Safe Third Country Agreement],” McDonald wrote in the decision. “The evidence clearly demonstrates that those returned to the U.S. by Canadian officials are detained as a penalty.”

Share this article
Share your voice
Did you find this article helpful?
Thank you for your feedback.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Did you find this article helpful?
Please provide a response
Thank you for your helpful feedback
Please contact us if you would like to share additional feedback, have a question, or would like Canadian immigration assistance.
  • Do you need Canadian immigration assistance? Contact the Contact Cohen Immigration Law firm by completing our form
  • Send us your feedback or your non-legal assistance questions by emailing us at media@canadavisa.com
Related articles
ANALYSIS: How Canada’s immigration strategy supports Carney’s “third path” to global prosperity
A view of the front of the Davos congress, where Carney gave his recent speech
Canadians to have visa-free travel to China under new trade deal
A picture of the Canadian and Chinese flags
How to work immigration benefits into your New Year’s resolutions
A group of people celebrating at a new year's party
Canada holds first Express Entry draw of 2026
A sentry stands watch over a mountain range on a winter's day.
Top Stories
Coming to Canada on a study permit? Your spouse may be eligible for PR before you are
Government instructions leave the door open for the Parents and Grandparents Program to return in 2026
Year in review: How did the Rural Community Immigration Pilot fare in 2025?
Join our free newsletter. Get Canada's top immigration stories delivered to your inbox.
Subscribe
More in Provinces
Year in review: How did the Rural Community Immigration Pilot fare in 2025?
A picture of a bench next to a running river in rural Canada.
British Columbia PNP increases nomination application fees for its worker streams
A view down the streets of downtown Fernie, British Columbia (a popular ski town in the Rockies) on a sunny morning during the winter.
These are the candidates Alberta is prioritizing for permanent residence in 2026
A shot of a frozen river, snow-capped mountains, and coniferous trees taken in Banff, Alberta.
Provincial nomination: Prepare these documents to avoid refusal
A person sitting at a wooden table and sorting through a stack of papers that have been grouped with coloured paper clips.
Link copied to clipboard