New Developments in AINP Class Action Lawsuit

author avatar
CIC News
Published: February 12, 2013

There have been important new developments in the Class Action lawsuit filed by Campbell Cohen and co-counsel Caron & Partners of Calgary against the Alberta Immigrant Nominee Program (AINP)’s arbitrary closure of applications filed under the US Visa Holder category.

Background

The AINP launched the US Visa Holder program in 2008. Individuals working in the United States on H1-B visas in certain occupations were eligible to apply under this category for Provincial Nomination, and thereafter for Canadian Permanent Residence.

In March 2010, the AINP sent notices to a large number of individuals who had applied under the US Visa Holder program, informing them that their applications were being closed. Most of these applicants had applied based on work experience in the US in Information Technology (IT) occupations. The applicants were advised that if they submitted a job offer in their occupation from an Alberta employer within one year from the date of the notice, their applications would be reopened and processed.

Litigation Agreement

As part of the legal action against the arbirtrary closure of files by the AINP, Attorney Cohen and Caron & Partners have entered into an agreement with the Government of Alberta as follows:

  • All the individuals who were affected by the arbitrary closure of their applications under the US Visa Holder program are entitled to file an individual judicial review case in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench against the closure of their file.
  • All such judicial review cases will be jointly decided by way of a test case. This means that one of the judicial review cases will be selected as a test case and taken to trial. The result of the trial will then be applicable to all the judicial review cases.

Proceeding by way of a test case provides all of the benefits of a Class Action lawsuit, in that it allows a group of individuals to pursue a joint legal action against the AINP’s arbitrary closure of their applications.

Individual Judicial Review applications must be filed before March 31st, 2013.

Click here if you want to join this legal action.

Share this article
Share your voice
Did you find this article helpful?
Thank you for your feedback.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Did you find this article helpful?
Please provide a response
Thank you for your helpful feedback
Please contact us if you would like to share additional feedback, have a question, or would like Canadian immigration assistance.
  • Do you need Canadian immigration assistance? Contact the Contact Cohen Immigration Law firm by completing our form
  • Send us your feedback or your non-legal assistance questions by emailing us at media@canadavisa.com
Top Stories
One section of Canadian law decides whether you can claim citizenship by descent, and this is how to read it
Newfoundland and Labrador invites 62 workers to pursue provincial immigration
Can Bill C-3 be reversed? Here’s what an immigration lawyer has to say
Join our free newsletter. Get Canada's top immigration stories delivered to your inbox.
Subscribe
More in Citizenship
One section of Canadian law decides whether you can claim citizenship by descent, and this is how to read it
A graphical depiction of a Canadian lineage
Can Bill C-3 be reversed? Here’s what an immigration lawyer has to say
Parliament can always pass new legislation and change citizenship laws going forward
Stronger Canada-EU ties could open new doors. Millions of Americans with Canadian ancestry stand to gain too
If Canada becomes an associate member of the EU, could that benefit some Americans?
Americans whose Canadian ancestors died before 1947 may still have a citizenship by descent claim
A busy desk showing a picture of Canadian ancestors, a red folder, and a small family tree.
Link copied to clipboard